In this brief communication, some considerations related to Fukushima nuclear disaster are presented. They analyse the roles of public and private institutions in the crisis management of the accident. This topic is still under attention because the consequences of radiation on people, environment, and the whole planet must be taken into account. This short review of the facts that happened should be a warning and a memory. Lessons have been learnt and future science should be the science of safety.

1. International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) , IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1990.
   Retrieved from: https://www.iaea.org/resources/databases/international-nuclear-and-radiological-event-scale
   Retrieved on: Jan. 21, 2020
2. N. Onishi, K. Belson, “Culture of Complicity Tied to Stricken Nuclear Plant,” The New York Times, Apr. 26, 2011.
   Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/27/world/asia/27collusion.html
   Retrieved on: Jan. 23, 2020
3. The official report of The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission , The National Diet of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 2012.
   Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120710075620/http://naiic.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/NAIIC_report_lo_res.pdf
   Retrieved on: Jan. 25, 2020
4. Final report , Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company, Tokyo, Japan, 2012.
   Retrieved from: https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/icanps/eng/final-report.html
   Retrieved on: Jan. 31, 2020
5. Z. Zhang et al., “Atmospheric Activity Concentration of 90 Sr and 137 Cs after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 52, no. 17, pp. 9917 – 9925, Sep. 2018.
   DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01697
   PMid: 30080962
6. K. Hirose, “Atmospheric effects of Fukushima nuclear accident: A review from a sight of atmospheric monitoring,” J. Environ. Radioact., vol. 218, article no. 106240, Jul. 2020.
   DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106240
   PMid: 32421574